|
Post by djmoyd1055 on May 22, 2010 14:58:12 GMT -5
My list is compatible with Sikita
Fable 3, Halo reach. Cross out Assassain's creed for me and just replace it with the new Batman coming out and I'm cool.
|
|
|
Post by Zigorkhan on Jun 21, 2010 9:00:40 GMT -5
Updates from reading about E3
Civ 5 sounds really awesome. Revamped and better diplomacy and AI. Only thing I don't get how they will impliment is unit construction, since tiles can't contain more then 1 unit at a time. Unless cities and forts allow stacking.
The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings, heard about this one, and after seeing the previews and news comming out of E3, sounds like it will be cool.
Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword. New Zelda Game!
And of course Fallout: New Vegas
Sounds like it will probably be a good year for gaming coming up.
|
|
|
Post by Zigorkhan on Mar 3, 2011 4:41:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Zigorkhan on Jun 16, 2014 2:19:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Kam ar taj on Jun 16, 2014 12:58:15 GMT -5
Yea i keep hearing about how great nintendo's E3 presentation was im not into zelda but that sounds pretty cool
|
|
|
Post by Goldmage162 on Jun 16, 2014 14:25:00 GMT -5
LOl, unfortunately I'm not much of a console person. The only reason I even know what Xenoblade is, is because I watch Chuggaaconroy, who just started Lping it. And open world zelda game sounds like a cool idea...and I have no idea what Hyrule Warriors are.
Also, to respond to some of Zigs earlier statements, I still love playing civ4..I remember when that came out, twsa amazing. COuld you give details on 5, assuming you've actually played it?
|
|
|
Post by Zigorkhan on Jun 22, 2014 3:29:33 GMT -5
Civ 5 never really struck me that well, and ironically I ended up going back to 4. The hex map layout was great, I liked the revamped trade and transport system, and diplomacy had a much better implementation that was more understandable then 4. I also really liked the addition to city states and minor one city civilizations. But it also had a lot of downsides. The system of choosing traits in an evolving government tree that was permanent i really didn't like. I liked the aspect of a changing government that can progress and regress as time requires with 4. The single unit per hex also really got on my nerves. I was too adept to the old Stack'o'doom style play, and the AI could never really figure out how the hex play worked. Also the design of the Civs was also kind of annoying. Each Civ was designed to play a very specific way, and the route to victory for that Civ was specific. And winning any other way was really a slog. I missed the ability to play any civ anyway you wanted, and the flavor came from the leaders.
Sadly I played for a bit, then went back to 4. But honestly I should look to see if they made a mod to fix some of these issues, there was a lot of good in there. But the over all package just didn't meet what I wanted to find in the game. I had too much baggage from 4.
|
|
|
Post by Kam ar taj on Jun 22, 2014 16:34:16 GMT -5
I still like 3 the most
|
|
|
Post by Goldmage162 on Jun 22, 2014 21:26:13 GMT -5
Lol, I mostly play 4, and 2 Test of time. I really liked the premise, senarios for that one (though they are buggy as hell....) and really wish they would make a modern version of it. Oh well ...
|
|
|
Post by Kam ar taj on Jun 22, 2014 22:30:40 GMT -5
you poetic son of a biscuit that rhymed
|
|
|
Post by Goldmage162 on Jun 23, 2014 7:05:43 GMT -5
you poetic son of a biscuit that rhymed I just ate my dad....
|
|
|
Post by Kam ar taj on Jun 23, 2014 18:13:39 GMT -5
phrasing gold....phrasing
|
|